2

SIGMA’s 2010 Collateral Survey Indicates Collateral Difficulties Continue

Welcome to SIGMA Actuarial Consulting Group, Inc.’s new RiskManagementBlog. After several years of publishing an award winning blog with our former sister company, Specific Software Solutions, LLC (acquired by Zywave in 2010) SIGMA has now launched its own blog.

Please be sure to register for future blog notifications by visiting www.SIGMAactuary.com/register.


The results of our collateral survey conducted in the last quarter of 2010 are now in. As you may recall, we invited insurance brokers, risk management consultants, and risk management staff of self-funded concerns to participate in this survey. The goal of the survey was to assess, on a national basis, trends in workers compensation collateral negotiations, exposures, reviews, arbitration, litigation, and other factors that SIGMA actuaries have been seeing with our own clients since the financial crisis of 2009. SIGMA completed a similar survey in 2009. The initial 2009 survey highlighted several trends in increased collateral cost and difficulty securing credit. The results from 2010 indicate that collateral difficulties continue.

Executive Summary of ResultsCollateral Survey 2010

Results of the 12-question survey, which received 157 respondents, largely confirm the trends SIGMA has observed in its consulting practice. The highlights of the survey show:

  • There was a decrease in the number of respondents indicating a collateral instrument of “letter of credit” with an increase in the use of cash as a collateral instrument. SIGMA believes that this is likely attributable to the pressure placed on many companies during 2009 to secure new collateral instruments and the increased cost of collateral instruments.
  • In 2010, 17.2% of the respondents indicated their carrier did not complete a collateral review during 2010. This response was not an option on the 2009 survey.
  • Companies are continuing to face many issues and changes in the collateral environment. However, there appears to be a decrease in the number of issues affecting companies. In a question intended to gauge the level of change, respondents were asked to select each of five critical collateral issues their company faced during the year. In 2009 an average of 1.5 of the 5 were selected but in 2010 the number decreased to an average of 1.0 of the 5. The issue selected with the highest frequency in 2010 was “facing an increased cost of collateral instrument”. There were three significant decreases from 2009 to 2010 related to the issues faced:
    1. The number of respondents indicating an increase in the cost of the collateral instrument decreased from 58.6% to 33.1%. We believe this could be partially tied to a shift from letter of credit instruments to cash.
    2. The number of respondents indicating difficulty in securing collateral decreased from 31.0% percent to 17.2%
    3. The number of respondents indicating there were either (1) changes in the terms or conditions of the collateral agreement or (2) increases in the collateral amount without discussion or negotiation decreased from 24.1 % to 12.7%.
  • In 2010, there was an increase in the percentage of responses indicating involvement in litigation or arbitration (from 1.9% to 6.9%) and a corresponding decrease in the percentage of responses that did not consider arbitration or litigation.
  • Credit risk assessments may now be affecting collateral calculations in several ways: surcharges, increased risk margins, or reductions in paid loss credits.

Further Reading:

More suggestions and observations related to collateral and our survey are available in the following papers published by IRMI (International Risk Management Institute) by SIGMA authors. We have limited reprints available, so please let us know if you’re interested:
“2009 SIGMA Collateral Survey Results and Analysis. ” March 2010, by Michelle Bradley.“Collateral Trends, Issues, and Tactics.” Risk Financing Perspectives, March 2010, by
Michelle Bradley.“Reducing Collateral Uncertainty: A Primer for Negotiations.” Risk Financing Perspectives, 2006, by Michelle Bradley and Lloyd Kelly.

“Reducing Collateral Uncertainty.” Risk Financing, Section III.L, 2008, by Michelle Bradley and Lloyd Kelly.

 

For Further Information, contact Michelle Bradley, ACAS, MAAA, ARM at 866-228-8279 x 204 or mb@SIGMAactuary.com

 

 

For complete survey results, including survey details and response analysis, please register for access to our password protected portal by visiting www.SIGMAactuary.com/register.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
Michelle Bradley, ACAS, MAAA, ARM, CERA

About Michelle Bradley, ACAS, MAAA, ARM, CERA

Michelle graduated summa cum laude as valedictorian from Lipscomb University in 1988, receiving a B.S. Degree in Mathematics. She then attended Vanderbilt University and received a M.S. degree in Mathematics. Michelle is an Associate in the Casualty Actuarial Society and is a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries. She also obtained the Associate in Risk Management designation in 1996 and received the award for academic excellence in that program. She served as president for the Casualty Actuaries of the Southeast for the 1999-2000 year. From 1990 to September 2003, she was Vice President and Consulting Actuary for Willis Risk Solutions of Willis North America. During this time she consulted extensively in the areas of actuarial, risk management and enterprise risk management. Michelle received the CERA (Chartered Enterprise Risk Analyst) designation in 2013. She has also served on the board of directors for the Society of Risk Management Consultants. She currently serves on the Advisory Council for Middle Tennessee State University’s Master of Science in Professional Science Program (MSPS). In the area of enterprise risk management, she has focused on modeling issues as regards integrated programs that often include non-traditional risks. She has significant expertise in risk mapping and alternative risk transfer mechanisms. She has been a member of numerous project teams that provided enterprise risk consultancy services and was part of the project team that completed the integrated program that was hailed the “Deal of the Decade” by CFO Magazine (June 2000).

2 Responses

06.15.11

What is a paid loss credit?

Michelle Bradley, SIGMA Actuarial Consulting Group
06.15.11

A paid loss credit is a credit given in the calculation of a collateral amount to reflect the losses that will be paid during the upcoming year. For example, consider the collateral need for an upcoming 12 month projected period where the collateral will be posted in four quarterly installments. The paid loss credit estimates the expected amount of payments made for claims during the 12 months immediately after policy inception. If loss payments emerge as expected this offset will produce a more reasonable collateral requirement at 12 months. Paid loss credits are not always included in collateral requirement calculations. The impact of excluding the paid loss credit is a more conservative collateral requirement.

Leave Your Response

* Name, Email, Comment are Required

Resources

SIGMA Actuarial Consulting Group, Inc. provides a unique set of resources in our password protected portal, available on our website at www.SIGMAactuary.com/resources.  

These resources are a wealth of information to help you better communicate and educate your staff and clients.  

Questions? Contact SIGMA…

SIGMA Actuarial Consulting Group, Inc.
5301 Virginia Way, Ste 230
Brentwood, Tennessee 37027
PHONE:    866.ACTUARY     866.228.8279
WEB:          www.SIGMAactuary.com